From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6006 invoked by alias); 4 May 2006 15:55:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 5998 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2006 15:55:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 May 2006 15:54:58 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-13-145.inter.net.il [80.230.13.145]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DGU53580 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 4 May 2006 18:54:33 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 15:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on Wed, 03 May 2006 12:50:59 -0700) Subject: Re: RFA: Document conventions for terminating query/set packet names Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Blandy > Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 12:50:59 -0700 > > > 2006-05-03 Jim Blandy > > * gdb.texinfo (General Query Packets): Document conventions for > terminating packet names, and their violations. Fine with me, documentation-wise. (I don't have anything useful to add to the more general discussion of which packets to prefer/deprecate.)