Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Cc: vladimir@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Don't reset watchpoint block on solib load.
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ur6i91xx7.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3prxuauap.fsf@codesourcery.com> (message from Jim Blandy on 	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:18:06 -0800)

> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:18:06 -0800
> 
> Now, if I later unload libx.so, the watchpoint should delete itself
> with an appropriate message, just as a watchpoint on a stack variable
> does when its frame is popped --- when a shared library is unloaded,
> that ends the lifetimes of the variables it defines, just as exiting a
> block ends the lifetimes of the variables defined in the block.

Actually, a more useful behavior would be to disable the watchpoint in
this case, and reenable it (and, possibly, re-parse the expression) if
the library gets loaded again.

Similarly when a watchpoint on a static variable, or an automatic
variable in the `main' function, goes out of scope, because the
program exits: it would be useful, at least as an option, to have the
watchpoint re-enabled when the program is restarted.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-29  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-20 17:14 Vladimir Prus
2007-11-27 23:00 ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-28 15:59   ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-28 16:23     ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-28 19:46     ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-28 20:04       ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-28 22:37         ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-29  6:09           ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-28 22:50         ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-28 22:18     ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-29  4:24       ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2007-11-29  7:04         ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-29 18:54           ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-29 19:03             ` Variable identification (Was: [RFA] Don't reset watchpoint block on solib load.) Vladimir Prus
2007-11-30  1:22               ` Michael Snyder
2007-11-30  5:52                 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-30 20:53                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-12-01  1:39                 ` Variable identification Jim Blandy
2007-12-01  1:47                   ` Michael Snyder
2008-01-16  1:29     ` [RFA] Don't reset watchpoint block on solib load Jim Blandy
2008-01-23  9:58       ` Vladimir Prus
2008-01-29 15:23         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-29  6:55   ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-29 18:40     ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-29 18:45       ` Vladimir Prus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ur6i91xx7.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox