From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30154 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2007 20:05:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 30142 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2007 20:05:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:05:29 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-126-53.inter.net.il [84.229.126.53]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id ION64857 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:02:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: vladimir@codesourcery.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20071214194721.GA2158@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:47:21 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place. Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200712142009.08263.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712142207.19754.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712141920.lBEJKVI1027649@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200712142240.20597.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20071214194721.GA2158@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:47:21 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:40:20PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Here's the revised patch. OK? > > linux-nat.c, linux-thread-db.c, and win32-nat.c all print only under > control of a verbose flag. While we're unifying the code we should > unify the behavior too - should this always be shown, or not? Please also amend the manual as appropriate (it now says the message is shown unconditionally).