Re: [RFA] Darwin/x86 port (v2 - part 0)

Tristan Gingold
2008-11-14T15:51:13Z

On Nov 14, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I'd like to know whether there are any large sets of failed tests that
> have something in common (a.k.a. unsupported GDB features), before I
> make up my mind.

Sure.
I was using a wrong gdb (was work in progress). New results are much
better:

=== gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes 10785
# of unexpected failures 653
# of expected failures 33
# of known failures 117
# of unresolved testcases 5
# of untested testcases 30
# of unsupported tests 59

There are a few obvious groups:
* unwinding through signals handlers doesn't work.
* shared libraries are not supported. There are a few consequences:
break printf doesn't work too.
* no core support
* no thread support
* call-sc doesn't work.

Tristan.