From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62483-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 32271 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2009 20:10:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 32254 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2009 20:10:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:10:38 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KH400100QJHUB00@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:09:30 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.23.114]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KH400GMNQNT7K80@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:09:30 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:53:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GDB ARIndex cleanup
In-reply-to: <000001c9ae14$24fb7cd0$6ef27670$@u-strasbg.fr>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <ur60km4gf.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <000001c9ae14$24fb7cd0$6ef27670$@u-strasbg.fr>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00593.txt.bz2

> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Cc: <gdb@sourceware.org>, "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz@gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:09:49 +0100
> 
> 2) GNU/Linux issues.
> 
>   This is more difficult for me to fix, as
> the difference between "Linux kernel" and "GNU/Linux system" 
> is still kind of fuzzy...
> 
>   Could someone else look into those issues?

Can you publish the list of files where this issue arises?  Are the
files you mentioned in this mail the only ones?

> 3) I also recompiled doschk program 
> so that the list of incompatibilities with 
> the DOS limitations is generated again...
> 
> Eli, there are probably several directories that we could
> disregard for this, but I think that 
> there are also real issues left.

There shouldn't be any.  But to see that, you need to prepare a GDB
tarball, then untar it using djunpack.bat as explained in
gdb/config/djgpp/README, and _then_ run doschk on the resulting tree.
That's because the file-name conflicts are supposed to be solved by
remapping in gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst, which djunpack.bat uses.

> Here is a list of Linux detected problems:

They can all stay "Linux", except for this one:

> lines 39,43p gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.h
> int ppc_linux_trap_reg_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);
> 
> /* Linux target descriptions.  */
> extern struct target_desc *tdesc_powerpc_32l;
> extern struct target_desc *tdesc_powerpc_altivec32l;