From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19719 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2006 22:55:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 19709 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Dec 2006 22:55:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:55:37 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-218-43.inter.net.il [84.229.218.43]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id BKJ62344 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 00:55:32 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: jimb@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061231224043.GA28190@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:40:43 -0500) Subject: Re: [c++] Pointer to member overhaul Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20061229025509.GA29152@nevyn.them.org> <20061231224043.GA28190@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00430.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:40:43 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > The sentence "CONTENTS is the bytes forming the pointer to method" > > isn't grammatical. > > Actually I disagree. CONTENTS is a singular noun here, the pointer > whose name is "contents". How about "CONTENTS is the byte pattern representing the pointer to method." A similar wording is used a few lines below the one being disputed.