From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24051 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2009 06:18:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 24037 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2009 06:18:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:18:20 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KEM00200S49OJ00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:18:40 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.238.131]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KEM00IT9S71GM30@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:18:40 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:18:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC][python] Add support for commands implemented in Python In-reply-to: <1233873605.14735.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <1233580405.7000.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1233873605.14735.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:40:05 -0200 > > gdb/doc/ > 2009-02-05 Tom Tromey > > * gdb.texinfo (Python API): Add entry for Commands In Python. > (Commands In Python): New node. Thanks. My only comment to the new text is that perhaps the COMMAND_* constants should have followed the respective GDB command classes more closely. For example, COMMAND_RUNNING instead of COMMAND_RUN, COMMAND_DATA instead of COMMAND_VARS, etc. But that's a minor concern, especially if you had a good reason to deviate from the GDB interactive nomenclature.