From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13453 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 22:38:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 13440 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2005 22:38:34 -0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:38:34 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-164-161.inter.net.il [84.228.164.161]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BYZ63332 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:38:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Michael Snyder CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <437E5380.2030703@redhat.com> (message from Michael Snyder on Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:19:44 -0800) Subject: Re: [RFA] Add new command class_experimental Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <437E38CA.1040300@redhat.com> <437E4335.2090509@redhat.com> <437E5380.2030703@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:19:44 -0800 > From: Michael Snyder > CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > However, I'll consider it a viable suggestion if you think > we should just use a branch instead. If you are not sure it's ready for prime time, then I suggest a branch, yes.