From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2850 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2006 04:27:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 2840 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2006 04:27:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:27:50 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-164-31.inter.net.il [80.230.164.31]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id ATC08926 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:27:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:27:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061017210311.GB12643@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:03:11 -0400) Subject: Re: RFC: Access TLS symbols without DWARF debuginfo Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060825021304.GA30225@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20060825134315.GA4994@nevyn.them.org> <20061010032226.GF22848@nevyn.them.org> <20061017210311.GB12643@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:03:11 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:25:12AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:22:26 -0400 > > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > > > > > > Eli, this patch added support for printing thread local (__thread) > > > variables in files without debugging information, on platforms where we > > > could already do it with debugging information. I'm undecided on > > > whether that's NEWS-worthy. What do you think? > > > > I think we should mention it in NEWS. > > Is this OK? Shouldn't we mention thread-local variables explicitly, even if only as an "e.g."? Otherwise, fine with me. Thanks.