From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27782 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2007 11:15:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 27774 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2007 11:15:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:14:03 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-1-43.inter.net.il [83.130.1.43]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id EDO78838 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:13:45 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:15:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vladimir Prus CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200711161334.40641.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (message from Vladimir Prus on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:34:40 +0300) Subject: Re: delete_breakpoint: don't try to insert other breakpoints Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200711142324.11319.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200711161334.40641.vladimir@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:34:40 +0300 > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > I'm okay with making the code cleaner, but on at a price of removing > > features, even if they are currently unused. > > Let me clarify No need, I understood you the first time. > Why keep unused code in HEAD? I'm sorry, I already said why I'm opposed to it. I have nothing further to add to what I said.