From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org
Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa] Retrieve libraries from remote target
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uod3vfkzb.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808131953.m7DJrw9Q009592@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:53:58 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: drow@false.org, eliz@gnu.org
>
> here is an updated version of the patch to have GDB automatically retrieve
> shared libraries from the remote target:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-05/msg00287.html
Thanks!
> +configurations. GDB needs to have access to the target's libraries;
> +this can be accomplished either by providing copies of the libraries
> +on the host system, or by asking GDB to automatically retrieve the
> +libraries from the target. If copies of the target libraries are
> +provided, they need to be the same as the target libraries, although the
Please use @value{GDBN}", rather than a literal "GDB", here and
elsewhere in your patch for the manual.
> +If @var{path} starts with the sequence @file{remote:}, GDB will
> +retrieve the target libraries from the remote system. This is only
> +supported when using a remote target that supports the @code{remote get}
> +command.
It would be useful to add a cross-reference here to where "remote get"
is described in the manual.
> +* GDB now supports automatically retrieving shared library files from remote
> +targets by using the `remote:' prefix on a system root path specified via
> +the `set setroot' command or the `--with-sysroot' configure option.
First, you probably meant "set sysroot", not "set setroot".
More importantly, this sentence should be rephrased, e.g.:
+* GDB now supports automatic retrieval of shared library files from
+remote targets. To use this feature, specify a system root that begins
+with the `remote:' prefix, either via the `set sysroot' command or via
+the `--with-sysroot' configure-time option.
As written, the sentence in effect says that it's GDB who uses the
`remote:' prefix, which is probably not what you mean.
Other than that, the doco patches are approved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-14 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 19:55 Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-14 19:37 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2008-08-14 20:24 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-26 17:35 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uod3vfkzb.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox