From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59942-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5316 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2008 11:47:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 5263 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2008 11:47:24 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.7)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:46:33 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KAB00M00NG1CZ00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:48:22 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.205.49]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KAB00299NGMXQG0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:48:22 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:04:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Process record and replay, 10/10
In-reply-to: <daef60380811102103l77922ea9g614bc6287b778a7f@mail.gmail.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uod0io7hl.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <daef60380811052352r48807fc1sbbeeb0f34c035217@mail.gmail.com> <uskq3sibo.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380811072039q14573f03kff6525121a0d5b19@mail.gmail.com> <ubpwqsh9r.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380811102103l77922ea9g614bc6287b778a7f@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:03:04 +0800
> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> >> > By the way, I think we need a NEWS entry for this feature.
> >> >
> >>
> >> What about add this:
> >>
> >> * Process record and replay
> >>
> >>   Record inferior execute log and replay it.
> >
> > OK, but I think at least one or two more sentences describing the
> > feature would be nice.
> >
> 
> What about this:
> 
> * Process record and replay
> 
>   In a architecture environment that supports process record and
>   replay, process record and replay target can record a log of the
>   process execution, and replay it with both forward and reverse
>   execute commands.

This is fine, but please make 2 minor corrections:

   In an architecture environment that supports process record and
   replay, a ``process record and replay'' target can record a log of the
   process execution, and replay it with both forward and reverse
   execute commands.