From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18296 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 05:39:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18091 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 05:39:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 05:39:09 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hNBq-0002wf-TB; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:38:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 05:39:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Cagney CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3F25FEE3.2050607@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:58:11 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] Doco problems with level two annotations Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3EC57FE4.1000704@redhat.com> <8011-Sat17May2003112039+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <3ECBE2D9.5060502@redhat.com> <7263-Sat24May2003110425+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <3F25FEE3.2050607@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:58:11 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Here's the patch with the missing Makefile tweak, and a comment > indicating why its separate. > > thoughts? Okay with me, but don't we have to say that this manual has no invariant sections?