From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11394 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2003 05:08:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11384 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2003 05:08:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2003 05:08:46 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19kczy-0005ap-8N; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 01:07:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 05:08:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Cagney CC: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3F31D476.4050803@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:24:22 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco, 6.0] (C) and other fixes Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3F2E85C0.1020504@redhat.com> <20030804162140.GA28146@nevyn.them.org> <3F31D476.4050803@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:24:22 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > I think, though, that there is a makeinfo bug here. It should have > reported an error due to references to missing sections. What references were pointing to the missing sections?