From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-40018-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 5265 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2005 10:15:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 5221 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jun 2005 10:15:06 -0000
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:15:06 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-153-6.inter.net.il [80.230.153.6])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id BOD08154 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:15:02 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:15:00 -0000
Message-Id: <umzpp1bgv.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <17074.32276.804157.95131@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from
	Nick Roberts on Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:39:00 +1200)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] -stack-select-frame
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <17072.62436.183299.55978@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<20050616044209.GA5907@nevyn.them.org>
	<17073.5179.249482.402135@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<20050616132120.GA5277@nevyn.them.org>
	<17074.566.194312.713028@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<20050616234728.GA14260@nevyn.them.org>
	<17074.16093.924351.774111@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<20050617032149.GF17013@nevyn.them.org>
	<17074.32276.804157.95131@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2

> From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:39:00 +1200
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
>  > > -stack-info-frame hasn't been implemented yet (I've think we've been here
>  > > before) but it would probably be quite easy to implement and I guess it
>  > > could work like I've made -stack-select-frame without an argument work.
>  > 
>  > *snicker* that's what I get for reading the manual.  I assumed it was
>  > implemented.
>  > 
>  > Maybe it is time to mark the unimplemented commands in the manual?
> 
> It _is_ documented as unimplemented in my copy.

Well, not really ``documented as''.  The manual says that commands
whose "Example" section says "N.A." are not implemented, but a reader
who reads a description of a certain command will not necessarily
deduce that.

I think we should simply @ignore-out such commands.