From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2871 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2007 15:29:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 2858 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2007 15:29:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:29:26 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-4-136.inter.net.il [80.230.4.136]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id JFN02761 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:29:06 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Pierre Muller" CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org In-reply-to: <008801c817d0$ccb32cb0$66198610$@u-strasbg.fr> (muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Subject: Re: [RFC] Doschk.c and update-web-ari changes Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <002601c817a3$fcdf7470$f69e5d50$@u-strasbg.fr> <008801c817d0$ccb32cb0$66198610$@u-strasbg.fr> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00716.txt.bz2 > From: "Pierre Muller" > Cc: , > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:04:53 +0200 > > > FWIW, I don't think it's a good idea to change doschk.c for this. > > This program is widely available and used, so it's better to modify > > our script to use doschk's output as-is; otherwise everyone will need > > to install a patched doschk to get things right, and also we will need > > to remember to keep a patched version where the ari script is run. > > I thought that this was a local file only, Well, if it is, then it's less of a problem, but I still think we shouldn't have a private version of doschk in our tree. > is it part of the djgpp distribution? There's a DJGPP port in v2apps/dosck11b.zip. However, doschk is not a DJGPP program, you can find it on GNU/Linux as well, and there's a native Windows port (that's what I'm using). > Do you know if the file in the ss directory is the > same as your file? No, I don't know. But see below: it looks like it's not the same program. > Where is the main source located? ftp://ftp.gnu.org/non-gnu/doschk-1.1.tar.gz > Currently, with the cvs doschk.c sources, > I get this: > CHANGELO DOS 8.3 dup 4 Filename gdb/ChangeLog > Filename gdb/ChangeLog-2006 > Filename opcodes/ChangeLog > Filename opcodes/ChangeLog-2006 That doesn't seem to be the doschk I have here. With my version, I get this: CHANGELO : ./gas/ChangeLog ./gas/ChangeLog-0001 ./gas/ChangeLog-0203 ./gas/ChangeLog-2004 ./gas/ChangeLog-2005 ./gas/ChangeLog-2006 ./gas/ChangeLog-9295 ./gas/ChangeLog-9697 ./gas/ChangeLog-9899 CHANGELO : ./gas/testsuite/ChangeLog ./gas/testsuite/ChangeLog-2004 ./gas/testsuite/ChangeLog-2005 ./gas/testsuite/ChangeLog-2006 ./gas/testsuite/ChangeLog-9303 CHANGELO : ./gdb/ChangeLog ./gdb/ChangeLog-1990 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1991 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1992 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1993 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1994 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1995 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1996 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1997 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1998 ./gdb/ChangeLog-1999 ./gdb/ChangeLog-2000 ./gdb/ChangeLog-2001 ./gdb/ChangeLog-2002 ./gdb/ChangeLog-2003 ./gdb/ChangeLog-2004 ./gdb/ChangeLog-2005 ./gdb/ChangeLog-2006 CHANGELO : ./gdb/gdbtk/ChangeLog ./gdb/gdbtk/ChangeLog-2001 ./gdb/gdbtk/ChangeLog-2002 ./gdb/gdbtk/ChangeLog-2003 ./gdb/gdbtk/ChangeLog-2004 ./gdb/gdbtk/ChangeLog-2005 CHANGELO : ./gdb/gdbtk/generic/ChangeLog-1997 ./gdb/gdbtk/generic/ChangeLog-1998 ./gdb/gdbtk/generic/ChangeLog-1999 ./gdb/gdbtk/generic/ChangeLog-2000 CHANGELO : ./gdb/gdbtk/library/ChangeLog-1997 ./gdb/gdbtk/library/ChangeLog-1998 ./gdb/gdbtk/library/ChangeLog-1999 etc., you get the idea. This does not show files from separate directories.