From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-60751-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4415 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2008 22:19:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 4406 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2008 22:19:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:19:13 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KCA00900TYI9C00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:21:40 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.252.83]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KCA00BS8U3TMN50@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:21:30 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:19:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: "info proc map" for corefiles
In-reply-to: <20081222202532.GA31896@caradoc.them.org>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tromey@redhat.com, msnyder@vmware.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <umyendfad.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1229626216.6602.15.camel@miki> <494AC2D3.9090705@vmware.com> <1229702034.6602.18.camel@miki> <m3prjoi20v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1229703833.6602.28.camel@miki> <uocz8dkjp.fsf@gnu.org> <1229960072.27356.0.camel@miki> <ur640c88f.fsf@gnu.org> <1229975651.27356.2.camel@miki> <uocz4c708.fsf@gnu.org> <20081222202532.GA31896@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:25:32 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> 	tromey@redhat.com, msnyder@vmware.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,
> 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> I wonder if we should rename or redefine "info proc".  It is currently
> /proc specific, so Sergio's new work for core files doesn't belong
> there.  But while it exists we can't reasonably add a separate "info
> process".
> 
> Or should we fold this into "info inferior" and make it work for other
> kinds of inferiors?

I'm okay with both of these ways, but "info process" doesn't sound
like a good name for core files, IMO.