From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62163-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5752 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2009 19:20:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 5739 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2009 19:20:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:20:43 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KGM00A005QD7600@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:20:53 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.218.225]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KGM002LC5QQHB50@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:20:51 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:22:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] disassemble-next-line
In-reply-to: <daef60380903152351n71100aecp8fbe3210f5e32a95@mail.gmail.com>
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, dje@google.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <umyblqnp2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <daef60380903072134n381d57a8ob82ac9c777d97bff@mail.gmail.com> <m3vdqi67lg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <daef60380903102016n3c8476b3w3e890df80c699ef@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380903121655o472538c9h84e25fac3548fb66@mail.gmail.com> <ubps5sqmf.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380903152351n71100aecp8fbe3210f5e32a95@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:51:51 +0800
> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, dje@google.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org, 
> 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> I had make the patches for code and doc.
> Please help me review it.

Thanks.  Everything is OK, except that you didn't answer my question:

> >> +If AUTO (which is the default) or the next source line cannot be\n\
> >> +ascertained, the next instruction will be disassembled instead."),
> >
> > What does it mean ``the next source line cannot be ascertained''?

I asked that question because I cannot understand the last sentence,
which uses this phrase.  Please help me understand what you mean.