From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62550-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11615 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2009 18:12:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 11607 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2009 18:12:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:12:31 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KHA0000056Q2K00@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:12:20 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.213.71]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KHA00EKL58KNNG1@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:12:20 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:56:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA][Python] Change gdb.Value.address from a method to an	attribute.
In-reply-to: <m3hc1cpc8z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: bauerman@br.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <umyb4kxo4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <orskllhfo3.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20090310125945.GA4376@caradoc.them.org> <1236700079.11106.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <orzlftfhu1.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <1236710732.11106.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <m3hc1rluz1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1237771863.25721.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <m3bprs9lqg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1238275138.8292.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <ur60hkoml.fsf@gnu.org> <m3hc1cpc8z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00660.txt.bz2

> Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:41:48 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> +@defmethod Value address
> >> +If the @code{gdb.Value} object is addressable, this read-only attribute
> >> +holds a @code{gdb.Value} object representing the address.  Otherwise,
> >> +this attribute holds @code{None}.
> >> +@end defmethod
> 
> Eli> The two uses of `gdb.Value' so close to one another and meaning two
> Eli> different things might confuse the reader.
> 
> Our readers are smarter than that.

Including non-native English speakers? I doubt that.

> But perhaps the first "the @code{}" can be changed to "this".

Fine with me, thanks.