From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21385 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2005 07:13:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 21367 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2005 07:13:05 -0000 Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:13:05 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-53-80.inter.net.il [80.230.53.80]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CZJ97737 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:12:58 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <8f2776cb0511152238k6b99cd93w4787781ba1120119@mail.gmail.com> (message from Jim Blandy on Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:38:30 -0800) Subject: Re: Fwd: RFA: GDB manual: clarify lack of restrictions on 'm' packets Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <8f2776cb0511150102s42abc0a7xfe9ee344ab0224b3@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511151158n20cc5636kc974bc0cf9d967c1@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511152223q4c1414f1l2218bc10dbdfa74e@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511152238k6b99cd93w4787781ba1120119@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:38:30 -0800 > From: Jim Blandy > > For memory-mapped I/O, both alignment and size matter; I don't think > there's a sense in which one is more relevant to the question than the > other. So I've committed 1-3; patch attached. I'm happy to change it > if you disagree, of course. I don't disagree. Thanks.