From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-42029-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20730 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2005 16:31:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 20723 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Dec 2005 16:31:41 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:31:40 +0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) 	by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) 	with ESMTP id HJB00774; 	Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:30:32 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-207-150.inter.net.il [83.130.207.150]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA) 	with ESMTP id CGY24614 (AUTH halo1); 	Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:30:29 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:27:00 -0000
Message-Id: <ulkyazcd3.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,         mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl
In-reply-to: <20051224161331.GA11718@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:13:32 -0500)
Subject: Re: [RFA] Linux Checkpoints, take 3
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <43AC7D2E.6020609@redhat.com> <u4q4yj4ul.fsf@gnu.org> <20051224161331.GA11718@nevyn.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:13:32 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
> 	mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl
> 
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 10:07:14AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > !       /* Detach new forked process?  */
> > > !       if (detach_fork)
> > >   	{
> > > ! 	  if (debug_linux_nat)
> > > ! 	    {
> > > ! 	      target_terminal_ours ();
> > > ! 	      fprintf_filtered (gdb_stdlog,
> > > ! 				"Detaching after fork from child process %d.\n",
> > > ! 				child_pid);
> > > ! 	    }
> > 
> > Might as well mark strings with _(), as long as we are changing the
> > code.
> 
> We've discussed this before, but I don't remember the conclusion - is
> there benefit to translating debug messages not intended for users?

Sorry, I don't remember either.  If we decided not to translate them,
then please disregard this my comment.