From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26459 invoked by alias); 17 May 2006 03:39:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 26451 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2006 03:39:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 03:39:05 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-81-207.inter.net.il [80.230.81.207]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DJQ94842 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 17 May 2006 06:38:58 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:39:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20060516200632.GR4123@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 16 May 2006 13:06:32 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFA] Update README post gdb-6.5 branch creation Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060516200632.GR4123@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:06:32 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > > The version number currently used is gdb-6.3. In the 6.5 branch, I think > it makes sense to have it use gdb-6.5. But in the head, I think it makes > sense to use gdb-6.6. That way, assuming we follow the usual pattern of > only increasing the minor version number for the next release, I don't > have to update this file at all after I cut the gdb-6.6 branch. I think README in the CVS head should say 6.5.50.cvs or some such, so that people who build snapshots would see the right version. If we accept Daniel's proposal, this will happen automatically.