From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-48868-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24901 invoked by alias); 11 May 2007 17:39:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 24890 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2007 17:39:38 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 17:39:36 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-51-101.inter.net.il [84.228.51.101]) 	by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id COI25692 (AUTH halo1); 	Fri, 11 May 2007 20:39:30 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:39:00 -0000
Message-Id: <ulkfvfeek.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070511172428.GA22529@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Fri, 11 May 2007 13:24:28 -0400)
Subject: Re: [rfc / remote protocol] Remote shared library events
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20070509201627.GA23422@caradoc.them.org> <ubqgt1i4a.fsf@gnu.org> <20070511172428.GA22529@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:24:28 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > I think we need to explain what is ``hexname'' here, unless it is
> > already used and explained in the preceding portion of this section.
> 
> It's explained at the target of the @pxref, where TextSeg and textaddr
> are also; is that OK?

Yes.

> > > +until the target responds with @samp{l} (lower-case el, for
> >                                                        ^^
> > I believe the letter's name is ``ell''.
> 
> "In reference, it is spelled el or ell." says Wikipedia; I actually
> copied this from a few lines further down in the manual.  If there's
> some reason to change el -> ell let me know and I'll do it consistently.

I'm just accustomed to ell, but if the manual uses el, let's leave it.

> Whoops!  I'll have updated documentation in the revised patch, due soon.

Thanks.