From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59443-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3985 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2008 21:11:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 3974 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Oct 2008 21:11:45 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:11:06 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.98.197]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K9500LLKS8W3I90@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:12:33 +0200 (IST)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:11:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA/NEWS] Mention new feature "Ada tasking support"
In-reply-to: <20081022201802.GF3638@adacore.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uljwge3o2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20081022195702.GC3638@adacore.com> <uod1ce694.fsf@gnu.org> <20081022201802.GF3638@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00559.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:18:02 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > > +    info task TASK_NO
> > > +      Print detailed information about task TASK_NO.
> > > +    task
> > > +      Print the ID of the current task.
> > > +    task TASK_NO
> > > +      Switch the context of debugging to task TASK_NO.
> > 
> > Is "task ID" the same as "TASK_NO"?  If so, let's use a consistent
> > terminology: pick one of them and stick to it.
> 
> Yes, it's the same. How about:
> 
>     task
>       Print the task number of the current task.
> 
> ?

Fine, but then may I suggest

   info task N
     Print detailed information about task number N.

(and similar change in "task TASK_NO")?