Re: RFC: add ability to "source" Python code

Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-11T20:43:00Z

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:21:00PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Considering that this is the only alternative proposed so far that has
> the most chances to be accepted, and that it is 100% backwards
> compatible, perhaps you could reconsider.

I've been successfully convinced that this would be a bad idea.

Could you explain why you think GDB should try to parse files
with Python extensions as CLI scripts? I can't think of any
case where this would be useful.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery