From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8327 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2004 06:54:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8299 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 06:54:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 06:54:34 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Asz6O-00025a-B3; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:53:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 06:54:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040216211516.GA17055@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:15:16 -0500) Subject: Re: [ob] Remove initializations of memset'd structure Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040216211516.GA17055@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:15:16 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > - MSYMBOL_TYPE (m) = mst_unknown; This part of the patch seems to assume that mst_unknown has the value zero. Should we have such assumptions in the code?