From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-40085-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19208 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2005 19:08:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18989 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2005 19:08:27 -0000
Received: from legolas.inter.net.il (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:08:27 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-44-230.inter.net.il [80.230.44.230])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id ERB17025 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:08:09 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:08:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uk6kozt96.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0506201106540.3771@wks190384wss.cn.ibm.com>
	(message from Wu Zhou on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:16:54 +0800 (CST))
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add code to support evaluating Fortran exponentiation
 expression
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0506171316270.15833@localhost.localdomain>
 <ull591bcq.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0506201106540.3771@wks190384wss.cn.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:16:54 +0800 (CST)
> From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
> cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > If this patch is accepted, please submit a suitable change for the
> > user's manual which describes this operator.  (There's a section about
> > Fortran-specific support where this info belongs.)
> 
> OK.  I will submit some document once this is approved.  

Thanks.

> BTW.  Do you means to add some words into section 12.4.3 to describe this 
> change?

Yes.

> It seems the text there is very short.

It says everything I know about Fortran-specific features and issues.

> Do you think that it is 
> desirable to add some other words to describe a little more Fortran 
> specific information, such as the limitation on evaluating Fortran 
> expression, the different symbol name (MAIN__ other than main, 
> sub_ other than sub)?  Maybe some others.

By all means, please add anything you think might be of use to GDB
users who debug Fortran programs.