From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7399 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2005 22:49:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 7392 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2005 22:49:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:49:52 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-247-65.inter.net.il [83.130.247.65]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BZC60794 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:49:38 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <8f2776cb0511191231y11805c1bqb4b4eb426b0e31fa@mail.gmail.com> (message from Jim Blandy on Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:31:20 -0800) Subject: Re: RFA: GDB manual: document tracepoint packets Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <8f2776cb0511191231y11805c1bqb4b4eb426b0e31fa@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:31:20 -0800 > From: Jim Blandy > > 2005-11-19 Jim Blandy > > * gdb.texinfo (Tracepoint Packets): New node. > (General Query Packets): Add entries for the tracepoint packets, > referring to the "Tracepoint Packets" node. Thanks. My comments are below. > + @node Tracepoint Packets > + @section Tracepoint Packets Suggest a @cindex entry here, something like "tracepoint packets". > + Here we describe the packets @value{GDBN} uses to implement > + tracepoints (@pxref{Tracepoints}). I think it would be good to have an @xref from the "Tracepoints" node to here as well. > + Replies: > + @table @samp > + @item OK > + The packet was understood and carried out. > + @item Does this @item really need to be empty? If so, why, and what do we want to appear here in print? > + @item > + The packet was not recognized. Same here. > + A successful reply from the stub and indicates that the stub has found ^^^ That "and" seems extraneous. Other than that, this can go in. Thanks again for working on this.