From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24974 invoked by alias); 13 May 2006 13:31:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 24965 invoked by uid 22791); 13 May 2006 13:31:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 May 2006 13:31:45 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-243-9.inter.net.il [83.130.243.9]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EEE71936 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 13 May 2006 16:31:41 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:29:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20060513105946.GA10678@brasko.net> (message from Bob Rossi on Sat, 13 May 2006 06:59:46 -0400) Subject: Re: CLI and GDB/MI documentation patch Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060512011730.GA26655@brasko.net> <20060512125433.GD26655@brasko.net> <20060512142135.GG26655@brasko.net> <20060512191640.GI26655@brasko.net> <20060513105946.GA10678@brasko.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 06:59:46 -0400 > From: Bob Rossi > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > You agree that the FE's should be allowed to work with CVS > snapshots, however, FE developers will not get the benefit of a nice > manual for those snapshots. Correct? Yes, except that instead of a ``nice manual'' I mean a ``manual that includes a full detailed description of what was the behavior on any given date''.