From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28428 invoked by alias); 17 May 2006 03:39:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 28418 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2006 03:39:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 03:39:42 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-81-207.inter.net.il [80.230.81.207]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EEZ27675 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 17 May 2006 06:39:38 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 04:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20060516201144.GA12800@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 16 May 2006 16:11:44 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA] Update README post gdb-6.5 branch creation Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060516200632.GR4123@adacore.com> <20060516201144.GA12800@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:11:44 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > For at least the last couple of releases, this file has just gotten > sedded. Should we have a README.in instead? Yes, I think so.