From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1973 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2007 19:19:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 1964 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jun 2007 19:19:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:19:07 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-238-199.inter.net.il [84.229.238.199]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id GWX01895 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:19:04 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Ulrich Weigand" CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org In-reply-to: <200706041358.l54Dw7sd029535@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (uweigand@de.ibm.com) Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa] [3/4] SPU enhancements: gdbserver support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200706041358.l54Dw7sd029535@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:58:07 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Ulrich Weigand" > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org > > > Then please say something like this: > > > > (@var{object} can be @samp{auxv}, @samp{memory-map}, @samp{spu}...) > > I guess I may be misunderstanding something, but already today the > paragraph immediately following the quoted sentence says: > > "Here are the specific requests of this form defined so far." > > and then goes on to describe in detail the auxv, memory-map, etc. > variants. > > What would be the benefit of repeating that list once again? None, I just missed the fact there was already such a description. Sorry. You can commit the patch in the last form you posted here. Thanks.