From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14027 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2008 20:36:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 14018 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2008 20:36:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:36:19 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-194-208.inter.net.il [83.130.194.208]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id EUN83159 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:35:43 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20080129164858.GA1637@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:48:58 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: detach-on-follow Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <18251.27455.529796.608240@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080129164858.GA1637@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00723.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:48:58 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > 2007-11-27 Nick Roberts > > > > * gdb.texinfo (Processes): Mention process command. > > detach-on-follow -> detach-on-fork. > > This patch looks right to me; Eli, is it OK? Yes. (Didn't I review it back then?)