From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24323 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2004 05:55:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24314 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 05:55:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 05:55:47 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BFRgc-0005Ut-Rs; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 01:51:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 05:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com,ezannoni@redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040419031744.GA22586@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:17:44 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA/dwarf] Eliminate dwarf2_tmp_obstack Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040419031744.GA22586@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:17:44 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > dwarf2_tmp_obstack serves as a general purpose dumping ground. After my > previous patches, there are only two things left on it: the linked list we > use to fudge GCC 2.95 line number tables (some day soon I think this hack > should go away; it was primarily for the benefit of the testsuite, and was > fixed at least as of GCC 3.1) FWIW, I don't think it's time to dump support for GCC 2.95: it is still in wide use as the system compiler on many GNU platforms. That doesn't mean I'm opposed to the proposed patch, though.