From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10120 invoked by alias); 30 May 2005 16:01:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25041 invoked by uid 22791); 30 May 2005 15:45:19 -0000 Received: from yosemite.airs.com (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (205.217.158.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with SMTP; Mon, 30 May 2005 15:45:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 16437 invoked from network); 30 May 2005 04:38:24 -0000 Received: from romy.inter.net.il (192.114.186.66) by yosemite.airs.com with SMTP; 30 May 2005 04:38:24 -0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-66-25.inter.net.il [80.230.66.25]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id BJN67391 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 30 May 2005 07:37:47 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 18:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20050529190550.GF11936@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from Christopher Faylor on Sun, 29 May 2005 15:05:50 -0400) Subject: Re: RFA: Use lrealpath instead of gdb_realpath Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20050528234233.GA3440@nevyn.them.org> <20050529142112.GB23858@nevyn.them.org> <20050529182726.GA28225@nevyn.them.org> <20050529190550.GF11936@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00636.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 15:05:50 -0400 > From: Christopher Faylor > > but I'm not sure that c would meet the criteria of whatever else is > using lrealpath. I don't see how can it not meet those criteria, since realpath and canonicalize_file_name both behave like this.