From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-40851-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6213 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2005 20:05:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6193 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2005 20:05:53 -0000
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:05:53 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-206-246.inter.net.il [83.130.206.246])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id CKQ61014 (AUTH halo1);
	Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:05:34 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:05:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uirwy5egh.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050918191943.GA27191@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:19:43 -0400)
Subject: Re: [RFA] print arrays with indexes
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20050907053951.GC1540@adacore.com> <20050907132316.GA3622@nevyn.them.org> <20050907202402.GF1540@adacore.com> <20050914171319.GD27542@adacore.com> <20050917204930.GB8777@nevyn.them.org> <20050917215138.GB2496@adacore.com> <uoe6r59n4.fsf@gnu.org> <20050918034639.GB6990@nevyn.them.org> <20050918054109.GD2496@adacore.com> <umzma5h42.fsf@gnu.org> <20050918191943.GA27191@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2

> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:19:43 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> We could do "0 is on, N is threshold, UINT_MAX is off"

Or perhaps -1 is off.

> but in that case, I'd rather give 0 and UINT_MAX names of "on" and
> "off" so that "show" output is more intelligible.

I have no objections for the on and off aliases.

> > that we already have so many different add_command interfaces (and
> > all but 2 of them are undocumented), I'd rather not introduce yet
> > another interface unless we really have to.
> 
> Well, then, perhaps this would be a good time for us to document them?
> :-)  If Joel doesn't have time, I'll do it.

I'll applaud to whoever does that.  TIA