From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14496 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2006 18:53:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 14488 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2006 18:53:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:53:13 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-200-208.inter.net.il [80.230.200.208]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CIX13738 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:53:05 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Amit Kale CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200601031835.45731.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> (message from Amit Kale on Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:35:45 +0530) Subject: Re: Breakpoints in constructors Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200601031835.45731.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 > From: Amit Kale > Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:35:45 +0530 > > I've rebased the breakpoints in constructors patch to current cvs. It's > attached for reviews and a submission into mainline gdb after any > modifications/improvements as per gdb gurus' suggestions. Thanks. Do we need to say something about this in the docs? We certainly should mention this improvement in NEWS, however.