From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24875 invoked by alias); 10 May 2006 18:10:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 24867 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2006 18:10:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:10:27 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-229-172.inter.net.il [80.230.229.172]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DIC56513 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 10 May 2006 21:10:24 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060510145904.GA6446@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 10 May 2006 10:59:04 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa] License clarification for observer.texi Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060508210440.GA18323@nevyn.them.org> <20060510145904.GA6446@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:59:04 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Just as well that Eli asked me to consult with the FSF. They prefer > something (marginally) less permissive. Here is the conclusion I > reached with Dave Turner (who answers licensing@gnu.org). I also added > a notice to agentexpr.texi which redirects to the main manual, i.e. the > GFDL. > > Eli, does this look good to you? Yes, thanks.