From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7629 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2006 12:06:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7620 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2006 12:05:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:05:58 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-163-171.inter.net.il [84.228.163.171]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id ESJ80421 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:05:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060921141803.GD22556@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:18:03 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa] NEWS additions for flash Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060921141803.GD22556@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:18:03 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > This patch adds news entries for the flash patches I've just checked > in. Is this OK? Yes, with a single comment: > +* The "load" command now supports writing to flash memory, when the remote > +stub provides the required support. I think ``if the remote stub provides the required support'' is better (``when'' has a time-related meaning, which is not what you want to say here). Thanks.