From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2416 invoked by alias); 11 May 2007 17:58:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2406 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2007 17:58:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 17:58:23 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-51-101.inter.net.il [84.228.51.101]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id GSM07368 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 11 May 2007 20:58:16 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Bob Wilson CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <46423A94.2090607@tensilica.com> (message from Bob Wilson on Wed, 09 May 2007 14:18:12 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH] edit documentation for TUI mode Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <46423A94.2090607@tensilica.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 14:18:12 -0700 > From: Bob Wilson > > I noticed that the TUI-related sections of the GDB docs are a little rough. I'm > no expert on this feature, but I thought I'd have a go at cleaning up the docs > anyway. I discovered a few minor discrepancies between the current behavior and > the document, along with numerous issues of style, formatting and grammar. > Here's what I came up with. Is it OK? Thanks! This is approved, provided that you take care of a couple minor comments below: > +@pindex @value{GDBTUI} > +The TUI mode is enabled by default when you invoke @value{GDBN} as > +either @samp{@value{GDBTUI}} or @samp{@value{GDBP} -tui}. > +You can also switch in and out of TUI mode while @value{GDBN} runs. The last sentence begs a question: ``how''? We should either answer that right there, or have an xref to where the appropriate command is described. > -@table @key > +@table @asis > @kindex PgUp > -@item PgUp > +@item @key{PgUp} > Scroll the active window one page up. Why did you switch to `@table @asis' and an explicit @key in each item? What was wrong with the previous method?