From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-49663-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17590 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2007 11:45:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 17580 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2007 11:45:14 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:45:11 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-73-173.inter.net.il [80.230.73.173]) 	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id IFE59944 (AUTH halo1); 	Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:45:01 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:57:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uir95mzsu.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl
In-reply-to: <20070630101854.GA29173@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (message 	from Jan Kratochvil on Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:18:54 +0200)
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix Linux attach to signalled/stopped processes
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20070606143432.GA11555@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <200706151801.l5FI1xH6022843@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070626210341.GA1406@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <200706262254.l5QMsrPn007445@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070627065203.GA9427@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070630101854.GA29173@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00536.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:18:54 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> 
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:52:03 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> ...
> > OK, going to move it to linux-nat.c.
> 
> Done; various parts changed.
> 
> 
> There is one ugly workaround part (described in the comments in the patch).
> Testcase for this workaround is also attached, it appears as (another) Linux
> kernel ptrace(2) bug to me.  Is it worth workarounding it?  IMO not worth
> fixing as it is a corner case and UTRACE is going to provide alternative API.
> 
> Tested on x86_64, on upstream 2.6.22-rc4-git7 and Red Hat kernel-2.6.9-55.EL.

Will this cause any user-visible changes in behavior?  If so, I think
we should reflect it in NEWS at the very least.

Thanks.