From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-50847-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6927 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2007 19:17:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 6918 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Sep 2007 19:17:03 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:16:53 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-253-130.inter.net.il [83.130.253.130]) 	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id IXS58084 (AUTH halo1); 	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:16:39 +0200 (IST)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:17:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uir661n4w.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <200709192227.27428.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (message from 	Vladimir Prus on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:27:26 +0400)
Subject: Re: [4/9] associate bpstat with location
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <200709080018.25052.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <utzq5qro8.fsf@gnu.org> <200709081843.47005.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200709192227.27428.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2

> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:27:26 +0400
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Eli,
> are you happy with the explanations above?

I'm still not convinced that a gdb_assert shouldn't be added where the
``impossible'' is described in a comment, but I'm willing to let it
go.