From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23449 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2007 20:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 23439 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2007 20:12:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:12:46 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.42.69]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id DZU79440 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:12:34 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <1193753649.4283.5.camel@localhost> (message from Luis Machado on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:14:09 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH] printf support for DFP values Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1193449497.6950.22.camel@localhost> <1193669215.4800.10.camel@localhost> <20071029201252.GA21583@caradoc.them.org> <1193753649.4283.5.camel@localhost> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00827.txt.bz2 > From: Luis Machado > Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:14:09 -0300 > > So, given the advantages of having the native printf support for DFP and > the disadvantages of not having support on glibc on some systems, is it > ok to commit this one? (Documentation and testcases will follow). It's okay to commit this one _when_ the documentation is part of the patch.