From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-61832-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22449 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2009 20:02:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 21798 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2009 20:02:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (HELO mtaout1.012.net.il) (84.95.2.1)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:02:14 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KFJ00A00BB80W00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:02:46 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.160.251]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KFJ008I7BOKRE10@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:02:46 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:32:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mips-tdep: info registers
In-reply-to: <gnuhff$kmv$1@ger.gmane.org>
To: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uiqn0rkfy.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <gn1iej$o3b$1@ger.gmane.org> <20090223020820.GC26056@adacore.com> <20090223025230.GA11699@caradoc.them.org> <20090223030014.GE26056@adacore.com> <u8wnxu77c.fsf@gnu.org> <gnuhff$kmv$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00451.txt.bz2

> From:  Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
> Date:  Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:05:03 -0500
> 
> > I agree.  Documenting it would be good, thanks.
> > 
> 
> I added a note about the regno syntax.

Thank you.

> ChangeLog:
> 
> * gdb.texinfo (info registers): Add a note about permitted
> info registers regno syntax.

The string in parentheses should be the name of the node in which you
made a change, in this case "Registers".

> Index: gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.558
> diff -r1.558 gdb.texinfo
> 7436a7437,7442
> > 
> > Note that syntax using register number (@var{regno}) in place of 
> > @var{regname} is also permitted.  While for some architectures (like x86)
> > @var{regno} has a meaning only within @value{GDBN} context and is 
> > subject to change in different @value{GDBN} versions, others (like mips)
> > explicitly define them.

This is fine, thanks.