From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12513 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2004 07:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12496 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 07:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 07:05:58 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AszG7-0003wT-Jd; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 02:03:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Cagney CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <40314F9E.7080708@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:17:50 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] Zap mi1 reference Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <402D2DF2.8030001@gnu.org> <9003-Sat14Feb2004133455+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <40314F9E.7080708@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:17:50 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > I don't think we should remove documentation of existing features, > > even if they are not reliably supported. How about adding some text > > about mi1 being deprecated and unsupported instead? > > Like this? Yes, thanks.