From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] configure check for curses library
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 05:02:00 -0000
Message-id: <uhdugoqkb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20040515180123.GP566@tausq.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00455.html

> Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 11:01:23 -0700
> From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
> 
> 2004-05-15  Randolph Chung  <tausq@debian.org>
> 
> 	* configure.in: Add a search for wattr_on to look for a curses
> 	library.

Does the TUI code in GDB actually use wattr_on or any symbols that
reference wattr_on?  If not, we could defeat curses implementations
that don't have wattr_on, but are otherwise good enough for what GDB
needs.