From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12463 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2005 04:27:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 12454 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2005 04:27:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 04:27:35 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-4-218.inter.net.il [80.230.4.218]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA) with ESMTP id DFJ39468 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 06:26:44 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Wu Zhou CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, mark@xs4all.nl, bje@au1.ibm.com, anton@au1.ibm.com In-reply-to: (message from Wu Zhou on Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:05:47 +0800 (CST)) Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:05:47 +0800 (CST) > From: Wu Zhou > cc: drow@false.org, mark@xs4all.nl, bje@au1.ibm.com, anton@au1.ibm.com > > Here is the reworked patch for latest 6.4 tree. Any comments? Thanks a > lot! I don't see in your patch where last_stopped_data_address is reset to zero. It seems like it always stores the last address, so GDB might think a watchpoint was hit where in fact it wasn't. Am I missing something?