From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3087 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2007 03:35:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 3078 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2007 03:35:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:35:48 +0100 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-237-241.inter.net.il [84.229.237.241]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id GMG55995 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:35:44 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20070410211034.GE2056@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:10:34 -0400) Subject: Re: Improve end check on rs6000 prologue analyzer Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200609301932.k8UJW0kw030997@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20061017212114.GC12643@nevyn.them.org> <200610181958.k9IJw88G009044@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070309150504.GA5166@caradoc.them.org> <200703111913.l2BJDEhC006601@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070312121843.GA24487@caradoc.them.org> <200703122102.l2CL284g022996@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070312210856.GA21953@caradoc.them.org> <200703122305.l2CN5AWw022470@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070410211034.GE2056@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:10:34 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Mark Kettenis , > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:24:17AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:05:10 +0100 (CET) > > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > > > > Yeesh! I didn't know that. Is there somewhere we could write it down > > > > for test writers who make this same mistake, maybe? I would have > > > > merrily written tests that expected the tab :-( > > > > > > Hmm, I'm not sure we have any documentation on this. Eli, do you know > > > a good location to put this info. > > > > There's a section in gdbint.texinfo about the test suite, which seems > > a suitable place. > > Yes indeed. Is this OK? Yes, thanks.