From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-50598-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26657 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2007 14:16:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 26649 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2007 14:16:45 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:16:39 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-200-121.inter.net.il [80.230.200.121]) 	by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id DMW69392 (AUTH halo1); 	Sat, 1 Sep 2007 17:16:19 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:16:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uhcmev5ca.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, roland@redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20070901131212.GA32719@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (message 	from Jan Kratochvil on Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:12:12 +0200)
Subject: Re: [patch] build-id .debug files load (like .gnu_debuglink)
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20070824180450.GA4216@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070824182028.GA19512@caradoc.them.org> <20070825224914.GA11255@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070825235805.GA11876@caradoc.them.org> <20070826094053.GA31348@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <u642w11sy.fsf@gnu.org> <20070901081934.GA31205@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <ups12vfro.fsf@gnu.org> <20070901113530.GA30667@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <uir6uvayc.fsf@gnu.org> <20070901131212.GA32719@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:12:12 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, roland@redhat.com
> 
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:15:07 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> ...
> > But the first command, the one to create the separate debug info file,
> > is still needed, right?
> > 
> > In any case, we should tell that these commands (or at least the last
> > one) is only needed for the debug-link method.
> 
> Enhanced the section I hope according to your advice.

Thanks, this is okay.

> +foo.debug} has the same functionality as the two separating commands and the
> +one linking command above.

I'd suggest to rewrite this as follows:

 +foo.debug} has the same functionality as the two @code{objcopy} commands
 +and the @code{ln -s} command above, together.