From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-53280-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27641 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2008 16:57:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 27633 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2008 16:57:59 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:57:40 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-248-94.inter.net.il [83.130.248.94]) 	by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id EPY72441 (AUTH halo1); 	Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:57:31 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:57:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uhchjq8vw.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <200801121618.m0CGI27U012957@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message 	from Mark Kettenis on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:18:03 +0100 (CET))
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue?
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20080109151745.GA13181@adacore.com> <200801092140.43362.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200801101058.m0AAw7HA023877@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200801101247.28736.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <1200001622.14654.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200801102208.m0AM8aDR023344@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111053547.GB12954@adacore.com> <200801111126.m0BBQQDB006618@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111182136.GD12954@adacore.com> <u3at4rrzy.fsf@gnu.org> <200801112113.m0BLDnAF024595@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <uwsqfqlhn.fsf@gnu.org> <200801121531.m0CFVW8I023504@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <ur6gnqbry.fsf@gnu.org> <200801121618.m0CGI27U012957@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:18:03 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > "*FUNCTION" is generally not a useful C expression, unless FUNCTION
> > returns a pointer.  So I don't want to rely on the user to guess this
> > magic in GDB.
> 
> Actually *FUNCTION is a perfectly valid C expression

I didn't say it's invalid; I said it was not useful.  That is, a
casual C programmer is unlikely to think about such an expression.