From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62230-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3670 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 22:12:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 3660 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2009 22:12:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:12:04 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KGO00K00869LA00@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:10:13 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.23.114]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KGO0061X890BV62@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:10:13 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:43:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] python API exposing inferior's frame stack.
In-reply-to: <m3ljr3lv8c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: bauerman@br.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uhc1rrebj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1236706351.11106.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <ubps9kw6u.fsf@gnu.org> <m3ljr3lv8c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00340.txt.bz2

> Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:01:23 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> +@tindex gdb.Frame
> >> +@tindex Frame
> 
> Eli> Please don't use @tindex, we don't use such an index in the GDB
> Eli> manual.
> 
> Now that we have documentation describing types, it seems like we
> ought to add a type index.

What's wrong with having them documented in the main index?  We can
always have something like

  @cindex @code{Foo}, a data type

More than one index in a manual complicates looking up things, and I
don't feel the number of types we have in GDB, or will have in the
near future, justifies this inconveniency.  But I'm open to arguments
to the contrary.